![]() Ease of use and personal preference are obviously up to you to test and decideįuji raw converter (either in camera or using the PC software)Įverything else at this point I considered unusable. Studio against RawTherapee (XE3 files), Irident Developer (XE3 files), and Aperture (X100s files). X transformer and enhance detailed fix all of that for me. Re: FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO vs RAW FILE CONVERTER EX 2. The worming issue creates an unwanted variable for which there doesn't seem to be any reasonable fix. It is designed for developing raw files from a broad range of digital cameras and targeted at users ranging from enthusiast newcomers who wish to broaden their understanding of how digital imaging works to professional photographers. By default you get a lot of jittering and jagged edges that look terrible at 100%, along with all the other x trans related issues. With Fujifilm, there are objective differences that cannot be ignored. RawTherapee is a powerful, cross-platform raw photo processing system, released as Free Software ( GPLv3 ). One thing xtransformer and adobe enhance details handles better than others is the aliasing of angled and especially thin lines. I came to these results based on pure quality of images, how well it handles aliasing, sharpening, general detail, color, etc. Here is the order of quality from my extensive testing from when I switched to Fuji a couple months ago. You could use that and then keep using Lightroom as you always have. It's relatively cheap compared to other software's and handles batch processing pretty well. For what's it's worth, x transformer by far creates the best files from the Fuji raws out of everything I tested.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |